It is one of the four sacraments of the catholic church that requires touch by anointing.
However...anointing a person about to undergo surgery is also permitted...and parts of the body involved may be touched directly...if it is appropriate.
So...with the person's permission...the priest might touch the head of someone about to undergo brain surgery.... But he would not touch the genitals of a woman about to undergo a hysterectomy...whether or not he had permission.
In these cases the rubrics recommend that the ritual take place...
Those are the prescribed ministry boundaries for anointing the sick.
It's understood...of course...that if a person is hospitalized or in prison or a nursing home...or lying unconscious in the street...the minister does not have the person transported to the church.
However...the public nature of the ceremony can be upheld most anywhere.
(Click on the tabs below to open a panel. Reclick to close to minimize scrolling.)
Until...a complaint of sexual
misbehavior was sent
to the bishop by several of his women parishioners.
It seems Father
Philip discovered what he
thought was a loophole
in the rubrics for administering the sacrament to the sick -- and he
exploited it.
The loophole being that
the sacrament of
anointing the sick could be administered to people pre-operatively --
even if they were not dying.
He took the idea of
touching the body part
literally and generally.
Over several years women
came to Father
Philip to have him pray over them before they underwent
surgery.
He
told them about the anointing...which
they understood as religious therapeutic touch for
healing.
All agreed to have Father
Philip administer the
sacrament...which he conducted in
private with only he and the woman present.
Father Philip
explained that privacy was necessary because the affected body parts
were intimate.
One woman agreed to have
her exposed breasts
anointed...another her genitals...another her lower
back.
Later as part
of their complaint the women stated that they felt uneasy but no more
so than they did with their physicians.
This 'ministerial' activity
went
on until
one woman told her husband about it and informed him that several of
her friends had been privately anointed by Father Philip as well.
The
affected families spoke together and the
complaint was made.
Father Philip was removed
from his ministry
and sent for evaluation and residential treatment.
Father Philip was
candid in his treatement
that the anointing was supposed to be therapeutic touch and he believed
it was.
Though he did not think of
his actions as
sexual...but ministerial..he admitted frankly that the anointing
procedure...as he performed it... was sexually stimulating for him.
His choice of a private room...with no one else present...violates many boundaries...
Father Philip also misrepresented the meaning of the sacrament to the women... by leading them to believe his was healing touch knowing that the sacrament prepares a person for death...not for life.
When terms like ministry are properly defined...you can tell immediately which actions are ministry and which are not.
According to our definition of ministry...this minister's actions brought neither himself nor the women he anointed closer to God.
You can return from this anointing the sick page to the therapeutic touching page.
Or you can...